Native American and The US government Essay -- essays papers

indigenous Ameri plunder and The US governmentThe Iroquois Nation was a nation of five tribes, which was comprised of Mohawks, Senecas, Oneidas, Cayugas, and Onondagas. These tribes were originally separated, only if later brought together by two Indians named Hiawatha and Deganawidah. Hiawatha seemed to be the spokesman while Deganawidah took on the role as a philosopher. These two men formed a nation where some of the ideas are still intact today. One expression that made them so strong was the way in which they governed themselves. Women in their high society were basically in charge, except for the Sachems who were representatives appointed by the heads of the Ohwachiras. When this federal gathering met, the Sachems voted as tribes instead as individuals. This in many ways squeeze out be compared to present day government electoral votes.Another tone I found that created a strong unity was the arrangement of power, which was demo in their seating arrangement. The M ohawks and Senecas sat on one side, while the Oneidas and Cayugas on the other. The two tribes were separated with the Onondagas sitting between them. This arrangement was a potty like present days balance of power in the three different branches of the Federal Government. The government of the Iroquois Nation has set themselves by from almost all other Indians of North America and made it a powerful force in denouncing the Indians as being savages. Todays Native American has adopted many of the ideas of the Iroquois Nation. Native American muniment is handed down amongst the tribes through spoken language and rituals. Native American religion is centered on the idea that every day items as well as the nature surrounding them can possess spirit. Euro-Christians views are more anonymous as to religion and more scientific concerning their history. Native Americans view of history contains many equivocal facts when looked at from a European point of view. When you consi der their lack of a written language, there are many instances where they do name unique(predicate) places from which they originate. Unlike the Euro-Christians, these places the Native Americans speak of can be found today. In contrast, Euro-Christian religion/history speaks of the Garden of Eden, but with no specific location as to where the garden can be found. Native American history is interwoven with... ...for what they needed to exist, not to turn a profit and destroy nature (the wilderness).Native Americans thought of collapses as symbolic gestures of friendship and peace at first. They would look at all duty as an exchange of gifts. They would have feasts after trades with the French, for instance to bolster the virtuous and finalize a deal. Even when the stakes were high and the Europeans knew that it was a gift and not a trade, the natives thought it to be a gift. When the Europeans traded gifts to the Natives for land, the Natives assumed they were work a gif t for the use of land, not make outing that land can be owned. Land was a sacred thing to the Natives and I interrogative they would have traded any of it, if they knew the implications of these gifts they were receiving (in trade).The Europeans on the other hand knew that the natives didnt know what some of these trades meant. A few Europeans tried to explain it to the natives, but to no avail. The Natives didnt understand to the Europeans delight. They used this against the Natives who couldnt have known the set of what they were giving up. The Europeans were at fault by knowing these trades to be idiotic and unfair.