Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Case of Building Industry

Countries often accept contrary trendls of regimen dividing line relations. The disposition of the regimenal system in a terra firma has particular see e very(prenominal)where the g overnments relations with the vexation. Despite the common ground of being move on liberal democracies, the joined States and Spain pay back markedly disparate stylels of disposal cable relations. The aim of the essay is to compargon the government line of products relations in the unite States and Spain with special reference to building intentness.Different Trajectories The very business culture and the governments relations with the business in Spain argon markedly different from those of United States. For instance, it has been pointed out that starting up a business in Spain frame much complicated than elsewhere, procedures much cumber any(prenominal), the steps more numerous, the documentation likewise. The twenty-eight weeks required to start a business in Spain contrast wit h the half-day required in the USA (Rollin and Richardson, 2001, p.181). It is be piss of the prevailing nature of corruption that is evented by the collusion between politicians and bureaucrats much(prenominal) obstruction of put down initiative exist in Spain. In the same way, closing down of a business in Spain too has been noted as extremely difficult. Eastaway and San Martin are of the opinion that the housing market in Spain has become passing correct through public intervention with the objective of satisfying the large and increase housing necessitate (1999, p. 699).The Spanish government has pursued a throw up of policies in order to mitigate the situation ranging from subsidies to market intervention. As a result, the expression industry in Spain is distorted and less competitive. Even the successes of the United States sm tout ensemble scale and medium size industries are attributed to governments desire to support small business owners and entrepreneurship fin ance, levy inducements, mentoring, training, and legislation allowing restrain liability for failure, all act in the interests of the entrepreneur.The entrepreneurial fabric and the brotherly/cultural/economic framework support and encourage those wishing to recruit on or expand an entrepreneurial venture (Rollin and Richardson, 2001, p. 188). The American government has been persistent in providing the necessary infrastructure and business environment over the post second world war period. through a business friendly approach, the American government ensures that on that point are more rewards and few risks for doing business in the United States. Moreover, the USA has long tradition of free enterprises contrary to the Spanish trajectory of protectionism.Historically speaking, the twirl industry in Spain is deepened upon twain the supply of domestic demand and the acquisition of foreign earnings. Francos controlling regime had installed a protective regime of business whi ch perpetuated monopoly and discouraged free-market competition. The inunct crisis in the mid 1970s had paralyzed the industry in a grave manner. The recovery came only with the join9ng of the European Community (EC) in 1986. The intimate political situation had long been detrimental to the free economic education of Spain. Ahijado et al.have argued that the aftermath of the civil war of the 1930s was international isolation and knifelike economic difficulties resulting from the destruction wrought during the war. Indeed, it took until 1950 for industrial production to return to its 1929 level, and the country re importanted over-whelmingly dependent on agriculture for employment (1993, p. 91). Then, onwards, Spanish deliverance took a radical turn towards accelerated economic development fuelled by touristry and the steady flow of migrant labor. Both the enhanced tourism colligate development and migrant labor have helped a boom in the twist industry.However, the technologi cal base of Spanish industry still remains low. In the recent period, Spanish turn of events industry has undergone a salient decrease in the average size of Spanish construction firms, in particular, and an increase in their use of subcontracting (Gonzalez, 1998, p. 432). It has caused a structural fragmentation of the construction industry as a whole. The changing nature of emerging construction technologies have primarily contributed to the instabilities in the construction industry all over the world.The fragmentation of the construction industry in Spain is accompanied two different features of increasing number of firms and the decreasing average size of the firms. Gonzalez has forcefully argued that the cause of observed fragmentation is changes in institutional restrictions, mainly labor and tax regulation (1998, 440). The Spanish government has a lopsided and imbalanced insurance insurance towards competition in the construction industry as it promotes small business uni ts against big firms.As a result, to be competitive, big firms have compelled to reconstitute themselves as smaller units and thereby prevent them from mobilizing great resources for the benefits of consumers. This tendency in Spain is understandably not in par with the United States government policy of promoting mergers and join ventures by construction companies. Moreover, in Spain, there is even lost speak to for creating new firms which too acts against the size of existing firms. American construction policy is mainly aimed at ensuring the security of buildings.There are large amount of regulations and standards touch on out by the various regulatory bodies appointed by the recount governments and the federal government. It also aims to deal with possible production of low property building materials. In brief, the building policy in the United States is highly bureaucratic and procedural as it attempts to save the industry from possible political corruption and the conse quent violation of rules and regulations. It has been well observed that the politicians-businessmen nexus in Spain has caused unnatural price rises in the housing industry.The effect such a phenomenal corruption cannot be contained within the borders of Spain as it is well corporate with the European Union Economy. In the United States, the use of precast cover system is not widespread although it has proved to be more beneficial. Because, there is a major(ip) shortage of expert personnel that can bearing and manage building construction that makes use of precast concrete components. The main reason behind this general lack of expertise appears to be the unequal engineering and arc giveecture curricula currently in effect in U. S. universities and colleges (Polat, 2008).Many researchers have well acknowledged the fact that the USA owes much of the success of its entrepreneurial activity to its economic and cultural environment, including affirmative action, employment law, tax incentives, government support, mentoring, and a can-do attitude. Life-style changes in the USA accommodate entrepreneurs (Rollin and Richardson, 2001, p. 187). Also, Choi and Russel (2004) argued that the construction firms in the United States have focused in enhanced variegation through mergers and acquisitions and thereby strengthens the growth in the industry and the profits and trustingness of stake holders.In Spain, the pattern of the developments in the construction industry is highly imbalanced and lopsided. It is well noted that growth in the late-1980s was in the relatively more prosperous Madrid and Catalonia regions, as well as in the independent region of Valencia, all of which benefited disproportionately from the inward investment boom. In contrast, some of the rustbelt areas in the nary(prenominal)th have been adversely affected by the even off of traditional industries (Ahijado et al. , 1993, p. 98). In America, ethnic differences are noted on the matters col ligate to construction industry.Doodrum and Dai have found out that differences exist among the number and frequency of occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities between Hispanic and non-Hispanic construction workers, although the difference did not forever and a day disfavour Hispanics (2005, p. 1027). Whatever reasons may be, the tendency in the USA is for Hispanic workers to be employed in more hazardous areas of construction. For instance, Two of the covering fire five Hispanic construction occupations, construction labourer and electrician, are in the top five around hazardous construction occupations (Doodrum and Dai, 2005, p.1028). Rollin and Richardson in their observational research on Spanish business culture have argued that current Spanish legislation does not favour entrepreneurs or small-business owners. Changes in EU legislation, such as the Parental Leave Directive, requiring changes in national legislation, can hit this group hard (2001, p. 185). It creat es a condition that even businesspersons who otherwise would have been law-abiding step asides the paradigms of law as there are numerous contradictions within the law.The multiplicity of legal frameworks in Spain by its integration with the European Union too have made a lot of bewilderment in the construction industry and added to the existing chaos. However, preventative issues and environmental priorities that are directly linked to the construction industry have not got sufficient attention not from American or Spanish governments. In twain countries, t is necessary for the construction policy to be framed on the rationale as to why certain matters are considered to be safety issues has its roots in environmental concern (Kibert, et al., 1995, p. 99). It means there needs to be a holistic to environment protection and safety oversight in the construction industry. The lack of labor flexibility has been a major factor in the continuance of the very sizeable black parsimon iousness (economia sumergida), estimated at representing some 23% of GDP (Rigby and lawlor, 2001, p. 169). Curiously, the black economy is the ground tackle of the building industry and the silent compliance of government policies based on corruption is leading into the deteriorating the healthy environment in the construction industry.Historically, it could be seen that the rigidities established in the labour market under Franco were consonant with the broader ethos of the totalitarianism which was strongly protectionist, corporatist and characterised by strong state intervention in most areas of activity (Rigby and Lawlor, 2001, p. 169). The recent Spanish government policy of artificially creating kelvin jobs in construction industry too has failed and only contributed to the ongoing recession.In the United States, although the general rate of occupational accidents and casualties in the construction industry very low, the roadway construction has reported to be more dangero us for workers. Through their research, Kale et al have proved that construction companies that outperform their rivals start a hybrid mode of competition. In other words, successful construction companies place varying degrees of emphasis on more than one mode of competition (e. g. , cost, quality, innovation, and time) rather than focus on a single mode of competition (2002, p.246). It is apparent that Spanish construction companies have not diversify and the government is less encouraging to allow fierce competition in the realms of cost, quality, innovation and time. On the opposite the American government has introduced new schemes and policies for ensuring nine-fold competitions at the many realms of construction industry. Conclusion To conclude, it is possible to argue that the different traditions of government business relations in the United States and Spain are result of the wider historical processes.The United States as a liberal democracy has back up free market and competition in favor of strengthening the construction as whole based on well established norms and procedures. But, Spain, quest the trajectory of Francos dictatorial regime introduced the policy of protectionism and government interventions in the construction industry and thereby rendering it incompetent and distorted. However, governments in both(prenominal) the United States and the Spain have to redefine their relations to the construction industry in order to properly address the issues of safety and environmental protection in the context of increasing global risks.Being competitive in the varied aspects of industry such as quality, quantity, labor and time with the active encouragement of the government but based on fair rules and its strict implementation by an impartial administration are the strengths of American construction industry. Spain too has all the potentials to diversify its construction industry and thereby strengthen the whole economy itself. Reference Ahi jado, M. et al. (1993), The Competitiveness of Spanish Industry. National Institute scotch Review, Vol. 146. pp. 90- 117. Choi, J.and Russell, J. S. (2004) Economic Gains Around Mergers and Acquisitions in the kink Industry of the United States of America, Canadian journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 513-525. Eastaway, M. P. and San Martin, I. (1999) General Trends in Financing Social Housing in Spain, Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 699-714. Goodrum, P. M. and Dai, J. (2005) Differences in Occupational Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic facial expression Workers, journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No.9, pp. 1021-1028. Gonzalez, M. (1998) Regulation as a Cause of true Fragmentation The Case of the Spanish Construction Industry. foreign Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 433450. Kale, S. et al. (2002) Competitive Positioning in United States Construction Industry, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 238-247. Kibert, C. J. et al. , (1995) Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 95-99. Polat, G.(2008) Factors Affecting the Use of precast Concrete Systems in the United States, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 3, pp. 238-247. Rigby, M. and Lawlor, T. (2001). The Spanish Labour Market The Quest for Flexibility. International Journal of Iberian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 pp. 168178. Rollin, H. and Richardson, R. (2001). The Impact of the Prevailing Business Culture on Entrepreneurial Activity and Small Businesses A Contrastive Study of Spain and the USA. International Journal of Iberian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 pp. 179189

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.